05-14-2008, 01:18 PM
05-15-2008, 12:51 PM
Is there any blank space for a young hobbiest like me? I'd like to work with you...
05-16-2008, 04:21 AM
I would be happy to take the lead on this ( i have plenty of time on my hands) and have loved Chaos dwarfs since their initial release.
I think that the doing it in parts idea is great and is also the most realistic for getting anything official.
Part 1 tidying up of RH list (rules clarifications and points alterations hobogoblins up a point, bull centaurs up to 24 , bolt throwers up to 35 each, hob gob fast cav min unit size to 5 - these bring things inline with other armies)
Part 2 a guide on how to make all of the troops in part 1 - Ideally from current GW miniatures - this could b the way to get around - No Models no Rules concept - see skaven mutated monsters or zombie pirates as examples. This would also include the best painted examples of these conversions, big hats and marauders
This means that parts 1 and 2 could be handed as a fait acomplit to GW for then to add fluff (or we can) to then use white dwarf / their site (although i realize they probably wont use it - its a great guide for new and old players alike and when printed out and handed to your opponent {i do this with the current list as people arent always familiar with our list} is a great intro to CD
Part 3 - new units / rules for old units - think this should be done unit by unit - old stuff first (tenderizer / whirlwind, Bazooka, mortar) - ideally with conversions - note hellcannon could go in here. Then the new units to create an experimental list.
I can dedicate time, project management skills and a server to this plus i can perform plenty of playtesting as i have a cool gaming group that are always up for new things (we have a player that frequently uses a doomwheel in his skaven army).
I realise i am relatively new to the forums but have been paying since 2nd Edition so i am not the whipper snapper some of you may take me for
Cheers
Bryan AKA Uberrtechie
I think that the doing it in parts idea is great and is also the most realistic for getting anything official.
Part 1 tidying up of RH list (rules clarifications and points alterations hobogoblins up a point, bull centaurs up to 24 , bolt throwers up to 35 each, hob gob fast cav min unit size to 5 - these bring things inline with other armies)
Part 2 a guide on how to make all of the troops in part 1 - Ideally from current GW miniatures - this could b the way to get around - No Models no Rules concept - see skaven mutated monsters or zombie pirates as examples. This would also include the best painted examples of these conversions, big hats and marauders
This means that parts 1 and 2 could be handed as a fait acomplit to GW for then to add fluff (or we can) to then use white dwarf / their site (although i realize they probably wont use it - its a great guide for new and old players alike and when printed out and handed to your opponent {i do this with the current list as people arent always familiar with our list} is a great intro to CD
Part 3 - new units / rules for old units - think this should be done unit by unit - old stuff first (tenderizer / whirlwind, Bazooka, mortar) - ideally with conversions - note hellcannon could go in here. Then the new units to create an experimental list.
I can dedicate time, project management skills and a server to this plus i can perform plenty of playtesting as i have a cool gaming group that are always up for new things (we have a player that frequently uses a doomwheel in his skaven army).
I realise i am relatively new to the forums but have been paying since 2nd Edition so i am not the whipper snapper some of you may take me for
Cheers
Bryan AKA Uberrtechie
05-16-2008, 06:51 AM
Okay well i can run the project plan (its what i do as a living :-) ), chase people, collate, hassle, cajoule, bribe, intimidate as necessary this can be done using a online project management tool i use so everyone can see the status of everything at any time, then i think we need a few dedicated people for each element. I can work with you on a plan - whereby we hit the major questions first then spiral out from them. I strongly believe that for it to be worthwhile though it needs to be primarily a modernization and clarification rather than a re-write so for example blunderbusses do not need a re-write just some clarifications (good diagrams) and as you say a tweak for multi-wound creatures (d3, or 1 wound per blunderbuss rank or whatever works best).
Let me know
Cheers
Bryan
Let me know
Cheers
Bryan
05-17-2008, 02:12 PM
Well, If you're doing something like a new 'list' for CDs I also would like to interfere. I am young (ehm.. right) but i have got a lot experience.
Maybe I also can write some rules for the new AL (=army list). But I think the leaders of this project should be an old, wise and an awe-inspiring geriatric (like Willmark, Grim, minty or ubertechie).
I like the idea to separate the AB. Well, maybe this will be the big time for this forum... maybe...
Maybe I also can write some rules for the new AL (=army list). But I think the leaders of this project should be an old, wise and an awe-inspiring geriatric (like Willmark, Grim, minty or ubertechie).
I like the idea to separate the AB. Well, maybe this will be the big time for this forum... maybe...
05-18-2008, 11:08 AM
Also i think it is important that for the RH to 7th ED we write no new rules and only clarify what exists -we also need to log what we have changed (if anything) and our reasons for doing so. Further doing the 1st step well is a good way to gain credibility for anything in steps 2 and 3
Anyway of to sleep some more (recovering form a stag weekend .... )
Cheers
Ubertechie
Anyway of to sleep some more (recovering form a stag weekend .... )
Cheers
Ubertechie
08-01-2008, 03:20 AM
Hi, I've been playing warhammer for a while and am greatly inspired by the games' theme. I'd love to help work on the art project. I'm having trouble entering the pictures. It seems I have to create a link to post them, why can't copy and paste them into my reply? Please help, I'd like you guys to see my work if this project is still running.
10-12-2008, 03:44 PM
I'd like to help, I have a little experience ruleswriting and quite a decent amount of experience doing various other stuff (coordinating, any IT if that's needed, I am pretty good at writing fluff if other people provide the info).