Draconis
Draconis
So they may have decided to take it out due to the points listed.
The 7th edition book lists the Chaos Dwarfs several times over, so I take that as a good sign. The GW shop around here also welcomes them to be played....so....I can only take that as good.
Draconis
drow21
but we do need a few more choices n things , im anoyed there cut out of the GT this year but then ive never been the sort of guy to play in one
Lord Darkash
War Paint
Excuse newbie naivity
Lord Darkash
Lord Darkash
thyrk the butcher
(kidding about the shooting thing) oh and my gamesworkshp in dublin ireland will not let a group of other chaos dwarf players to play battles i me after spending so much money sarting my army
Sigose
Tallhat
- Tallhat
Tallhat
- Tallhat
Tallhat

- Tallhat
Tallhat
- Tallhat
McNs
I understand Jervis' point about new models and I understand they're reluctant to pick up an army that tanked last time they released it. Is there anyway we could show GW how much money we currently spend or would be willing to spend on the new CD figures? Save receipts or barcodes, etc.?
@ Xander and wallacer: I'm sorry to hear you've both recently had medical issues; I wish you both the best of health!
- McNs
Tallhat
- Tallhat
Tallhat
Random CD forum: We want a Updated RH .pdf
GW: We really like CDs but we dont think its fair to update the rules without providing models.
Random CD forum: But we want a Updated RH .pdf to use with our models.
GW: *twitch*
repeat every six months for the past decade...
Good Lord Metro you really dont want us to have a new list do you? Because that there is just plain silly... We are not asking for new minis nor do we ask for a new list. We just, when all is said and done, ask for clarification on certain things that are no longer relevant or not clarified in the current rules. Fact is that they provided some get you by rules for 6th edition for the CD that are now obsolete, and so in my book they are, as the people who first provided the army list and allowed us to use it in the 6th edition, obliged to support this to a certain extent even if this means that they will have to update some rules. If GW wont permanently stop producing both fluff and rules for the Dawi'Zharr we deserve an update since they then in the first place never should have made the list if they never intended on updating it. A get you by list as this list makes people expect that there will at some point be at least a minor update. For crying out loud Metro you cannot possibly think that it is wrong that people want to know what they can or cannot do in 7th edition Warhammer? It really seems sometimes like the only thing that keeps you going is the fact that you can keep complaining about the fact that GW do not give us that update. And to be frank that attitude will never get us anywhere. Ive known you through both this site and HoH for quite some time, even before my brake from the game (at least on HoH and that was over a year ago) and Ive always held you in high regards since you have a lot of background knowledge about this game that I very much envy you amd you are clearly, through your posts on the tactics forum, an accomplished general who always gives sound advice to new players, but I am sick of you almost denying the fact that we may ever get an update, I dare say an Armybook, all the time. Again I do not mean any harm by what I post here, I am merely stating my honest feelings about this subject and you are absolutely free to say whatever you want back since I know that I myself am by no means perfect. But please do stop those negative thoughts all the time about us getting an armybook. It doesnt do any good and, if you really do think so then ask yourself is it really worth playing this army?
- Tallhat
Tallhat
because I am the only one who really wants them to re-do the list...
no matter what the cost... we need a new list...
So you are actually saying that you are the only one on this site who REALLY wants a list that the rest of us are just moaning and groaning about past days? If you ever noticed I have always accepted the fact that big hats will never ever return. I have always advocated that we need a new list completely redone in structure and feel. The thing that Ive always said would be hard for GW to change is the fluff that exists for the Dawi'zharr since that has at least in some ways been confirmed through maps and bits and pieces of information through the books. So to say that you are the only one on this site who wants a book is ,if I may put it bluntly, complete rubbish. We all want that book, but we all have certain ideas on how this book should be. You for example want "Dwarfs of Chaos" but what does that mean? Does this mean 3rd edition style CD? If so then that is how you want them to be but that is hardly the way everyone sees this and to be frank a return to the 3rd edition days is as unlikely as it is to see Big Hats again. I must say that I got a tad annoyed when I read this post where you for some reason almost sound like a lone crusader fighting for this book, which isnt true. This site proves that there are hundreds if not thousands out there that want this book as badly as you. So do not tell me that you are the only one who wants them to redo this list.
- Tallhat
Tallhat
*laughs* Yeah Ive heard that about a zillion times too
I do find it quite small however. I remeber at a tourney I went to a couple of years ago where someone had built a Baneblade that was the size of the Baneblade in Final LIberation, if anyone remembers that old pearl?
- Tallhat
Tallhat
As good an idea as it is it is not so easy as to "just" make your own GT. ![]()
- Tallhat