CDO Forums

Full Version: Do Chaos Dwarfs consider themselves "Chaos"?
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Could be. GW has never been consistent in the history of the warhammer world as the game has evovled.
Plus calling them Fire Dwarfs doesn't have the same cache that "Chaos Dwarfs" do. Unless it conjures up images of dwarfs being lit on fire in some sort of bizarre Side Show stage act from the 1800's.... Happy
I've always thought of Hashut as a minor god of chaos (as I seem to remember the 40k fluff makes mention of the hordes of minor chaos gods & demi-gods).  Don't all chaos worshippers look down on the followers of the other gods?  As for not showing the usual chaos trademarks (mutations and daemons), dwarves are supposed to be hardy and resistant to the physical corruption of chaos.  As for the daemons, well...as the Chaos Dwarfs are known for binding daemons into their war machines I would think that daemons would be a bit leery of showing their faces around the Dawi'Zharr.

Just my opinion though.
Tommy you bring up some good points. Thinking back to basic D&D the alignments were good, neutral and chaos with chaos being equal to evil. GW has rarely made a distinction in such a way (really only in warhammer roleplay). I too see chaos dwsrfs as orderly, following the letter of the law(their own) and being evil to boot.

torn Wrote:
the chaotic wording from D&D refers to the characters personality, if they are chaotic they are unruly, murderous etc

it has absolutely nothing to do with the use of chaos in warhammer, which is as a noun, and has nothing to do with the personalities or traits of their followers. in fact chaos cultists and warriors are very orderly in what they do.


Ummm well aware of that; been playing it since October of 1982. I'm not talking about 3rd edition D&D right now I'm talking about original D&D from the 70's /early 80's which was much more abstract in the ideas of ethos. Gary was starting from scratch. Hence his overly simplistic Good equating to Law; Chaos=evil.

Skip to Warhammer. Bryan Ansell who founded GW in essence was a huge fan of Moorcock and his writing. A good deal of imagery and game rules were of the whole Law vs. Chaos motif early on. As time went by these were dropped from the game. Warhammer fantasy role-play had gods of Law in the rules. Ultimately even Warhammer admits in the 1st edition fantasy role-play that is one of the possibilities, out of the multitude of possibilities of chaos is law.

Simply put I agree chaos is a noun as you are saying... simply put chaos can be used for any number of monikers, and in a way denoting some sort of evil. At least this is how I see it, YMMV.

Thommy H Wrote:
Of course, the AD&D (and therefore the current version of D&D) alignments are more complex. You have the Good-Neutral-Evil axis (which represents pure selfishness and capacity for destructive actions) and the Lawful-Neutral-Chaotic axis (which represents response to authority and society).

So, for example, an orc might be chaotic evil (no real concept of society, simply destroys for fun), a dark elf would be neutral evil (just evil for the sake of being evil, largely) and a chaos dwarf is lawful evil (total bastards, but within a strict hierarchy which makes them unswervingly loyal to their masters - Dawi'Zharr don't backstab their superiors).

But, as I've said, the alignment system from D&D doesn't really fit with Warhammer anyway. A mortal follower of Chaos would be chaotic evil, but a daemon (who cannot escape its place in the heirachy of its kind) would be lawful evil - even though both are followers of "Chaos". Plus there really isn't a lot of 'good' in the world - the equivalent of the Paladian character class (which is always Lawful Good) are monstrous oppressors of the peasant class of their own nation, after all.


Which I am in agreement with. The warhammer world doesn't neatly fit into such rigid mores as does (most) D&D worlds whatever the flavor. Hell, I'd offer up that it could be conceivably be argued that the World of Warhammer is predominately shades of gray, sort of like a bell curve with law/chaos, evil/good  on the ends. Again YMMV.

Quote:
I agree with you that slavery in the modern day probably would be considered evil


God almighty...

"Probably"?

"Probably"?

This is not about a difference of opinion. This is not about me "forcing people to share my opinion" either - it's slavery. If you think it's anything but evil then you're WRONG.

I'm trying really hard not to fly off the handle, but I don't know if I can be polite when people are saying things like this. Both of you are paying lip service to decency and saying things like "no one is saying it's okay" when, in the next sentence you do exactly that.

Rape used to be acceptable too. Genocide was considered a fine way to deal with your neighbours is the ancient world. Slavery, and the kind of attitude that enforces it, belongs with this kind of thinking.

Quote:
While probably un-intentional, comments like this can cause upset.


There was nothing unintentional about what I said. I'm offended by someone trying to justify slavery because that kind of attitude is downright repellent. I think you guys need to take a moment to think about what you're actually saying, and what kind of regimes you're supporting with your comments.

No one in the modern age with more than half a brain thinks for even a second that slavery isn't something completely horrible that is an immediate indicator that the perpetrator is evil. I have no idea why you don't agree with that, and I can only conclude that it's due to stupidity or insanity.

I won't apologise for being the only one in this discussion who appears to be able to think rationally.

Gonna have to side with tommy on this one, but please let get this thread back on topic.
Ok ill say that they do in there own way.

They aided Chaos in Storm of Chaos, Hashut is really a Chaos God, and its in our name CHAOS Dwarfs.

We just think different to regular Chaos they just run in not planning and are disorganised and we seem to plan an awful lot instead of doing anything. If we eventually get around to attacking the west, ever im sure we would conquer it muahaha Happy

So yes I would say yes CD would consider themselves a organised Chaos. We worhsip a Chaos God anyhow Hashut!

Quote:
I would let you know that you are definately offending me with the abrupt, abusive and 'holier than thou' manner of your responses to the last couple of threads.


My intent was to offend, I assure you. I feel extremely strongly about this issue.

When you make excuses like "it was acceptable in the ancient world", you're justifying the opinion that slavery isn't something that is always reprehensible, which it is. Again, I reiterate: many things have been acceptable, even laudable, in the past which are now considered abhorrent: rape, genocide, honour killings, imperialistic conquest of weaker nations. It doesn't change the fact that slavery is quite clearly something evil and monstrous.

Quote:
For example, you could only beat your slave for very good reasons, mistreating slaves was as bad as mistreating non-slaves.


See, it's stuff like this that reads like an excuse to me. The circumstances of slavery are irrelevant - it doesn't matter if it "wasn't that bad"; the very concept of owning another human being is offensive and disgusting. Every time someone in this thread tries to explain some quirk of history, it just sounds like you're justifying evil. Don't do it. We're not discussing the historical fact of slavery, we're discussing whether forced servitude, as a concept, it one which can be considered evil. There should be no debate on that subject.

Quote:
CD's are not numerous enough to work their own forges, they need slaves for their society to function.  That is not necessarily evil in their eyes.


And this is even crazier! You're missing the whole point, and what I see here is "misaimed fandom" - because they're your army, you don't want to think they're the bad guys I guess. Chaos Dwarfs are very definitely evil: they were written to be so. There's no grey area in what they do - they're complete monsters who sacrifice other people to their god in elaborate rituals and work millions of slaves to death.

Just because they don't think it's evil, doesn't mean that we, from our position as outside observers of a fictional society, can't condemn them. They're an evil race.

Which has nothing to do with the reason I started this thread at all, of course, but someone decided to take it off-topic by saying that "no one in the Warhammer world is evil" when, by any modern definition, pretty much everyone in the setting is just that. It's kind of the point, guys.

wallacer Wrote:

gIL^ Wrote:
sigmar is love.


Sigmar was a hard living, hard fighting Barbarian who laid the smack down on anyone who refused to join his Empire.


Then he would have had a great career in the WWE but he had to go and ruin it byy becoming a deity... Happy

well, malal, but we wont get into that here....

*depressurization of the worm can echos through the interweb....*
well it simple go to the resterant order an egg and a chicken and see what comes first.
come on grims read another story please
well tough guy lead the army i got your back
*Kera pack all her weapons and says to tallhat  lets go!!!
*Kera thows her hands in the air    as the sun set she walk to the slayer kingdom.
so who else is going* Kera turns her head and yells!
Seven pages!What a Beast!
you need to go to bed cranky Pyro
now i know why pyro is cranky.
* kera fall out of her chair laughting*thanks bill117
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Reference URL's